Menu
Sign in to your account
  • McGill
We've got the best instructors.
It's a fact.
Meet our instructors

Your future is bright when you have these brilliant instructors on your side.

Chad

Instructor
since2006
Prep
sessions191
View Profile
Antoine

Instructor
since2005
Prep
sessions326
View Profile
Luke

Instructor
since2007
Prep
sessions288
View Profile
Amy

Instructor
since2008
Prep
sessions53
View Profile
Sandi

Instructor
since2005
Prep
sessions19
View Profile
Lamis

Instructor
since2018
Prep
sessions6
View Profile
Cindy

Instructor
since2017
Prep
sessions12
View Profile
Chun

Instructor
since2017
Prep
sessions14
View Profile
Load more instructors
Chad

Chad

Instructor since 2006
191 prep sessions
23429 students helped
Experience
2006 -Chemistry Prep Instructor
2005 -MCAT Chemistry Prep Instructor
2005 -MCAT Organic Chemistry Prep Instructor
2003-7Chemistry Tutor
2004-6Organic Chemistry TA
Education
2008MSc (Medicinal Organic Chemistry)
2006BSc (Honours Chemistry)
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
Expertise(understanding of course material)
 
5.87
Organization(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.81
Explanation(explains concepts clearly and concisely)
 
5.74
Engagement(shows enthusiasm and interest in material)
 
5.79
Responsiveness(answers questions thoroughly)
 
5.77
Preparation(thoroughly prepared to teach)
 
5.87
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 86.6%
satisfied 13.3%
not satisfied 0.4%

Antoine

Instructor since 2005
326 prep sessions
40102 students helped
Experience
2010 -Differential Equations Prep Instructor
2005 -CEGEP Math Instructor (Tenured)
2005 -Calculus (all levels) Prep Instructor
2005 -Linear Algebra Prep Instructor
2005 -Probability Prep Instructor
2001-4University Math Instructor
Education
2002-9Partial PhD Completion (Mathematics)
2005Certificate in University Teaching
2002MSc (Mathematics)
2000BSc (Mathematics)
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
Expertise(understanding of course material)
 
5.81
Organization(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.63
Explanation(explains concepts clearly and concisely)
 
5.60
Engagement(shows enthusiasm and interest in material)
 
5.75
Responsiveness(answers questions thoroughly)
 
5.65
Preparation(thoroughly prepared to teach)
 
5.72
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 75.9%
satisfied 23.7%
not satisfied 0.4%

Luke

Instructor since 2007
288 prep sessions
30225 students helped
Experience
2007-Physics Prep Instructor
2007-MCAT Physics Prep Instructor
2007Oscillations and Waves Lecturer
2004-6Physics Lab Demonstrator
2005Communications for Physicists Lecturer
2002-4Physics Tutor
2002-3Online Physics Course Co-developer
2002-3Electronics Lab Demonstrator
Education
2005MSc (Physics)
2004MSc (Physics)
2002BSc (Physics)
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
Expertise(understanding of course material)
 
5.73
Organization(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.61
Explanation(explains concepts clearly and concisely)
 
5.43
Engagement(shows enthusiasm and interest in material)
 
5.71
Responsiveness(answers questions thoroughly)
 
5.51
Preparation(thoroughly prepared to teach)
 
5.65
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 72.6%
satisfied 26.6%
not satisfied 0.8%
Amy Wong

Amy

Instructor since 2008
53 prep sessions
2511 students helped
Experience
2008 -Chemistry Prep Instructor 
2008 -Organic Chemistry Prep Instructor
1998 -Chemistry Tutor
2004-6Analytical Chemistry and Organic Chemistry TA
2002-6Biochemistry TA
2000-6General Chemistry TA
Education
2006MSc (Biochemistry and Chemistry)
2004HBSc (Biochemistry)
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
Expertise(understanding of course material)
 
5.76
Organization(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.52
Explanation(explains concepts clearly and concisely)
 
5.48
Engagement(shows enthusiasm and interest in material)
 
5.79
Responsiveness(answers questions thoroughly)
 
5.72
Preparation(thoroughly prepared to teach)
 
5.75
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 65.5%
satisfied 34.0%
not satisfied 0.6%
Sandi Mak

Sandi

Instructor since 2005
19 prep sessions
705 students helped
Experience
2006 –Math College Instructor
2005 -Math Prep Instructor
2006Math University Lecturer
2003-6Mathematics and Statistics TA
2003-6Mathematics and Statistics Tutor
Education
2006MA (Teaching Mathematics)
2002BA (Mathematics and Statistics)
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
Expertise(understanding of course material)
 
5.71
Organization(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.21
Explanation(explains concepts clearly and concisely)
 
5.07
Engagement(shows enthusiasm and interest in material)
 
5.43
Responsiveness(answers questions thoroughly)
 
5.79
Preparation(thoroughly prepared to teach)
 
5.64
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 59.5%
satisfied 37.8%
not satisfied 2.7%
Lamis

Lamis

Instructor since 2018
6 prep sessions
202 students helped
Experience
2018 -Economics instructor
2016 -Economics TA
2012 -Economics tutor
Education
2016 -PhD (Economics)
2015MA (Economics)
2012BA (Economics)
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
Expertise(understanding of course material)
 
5.91
Organization(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.73
Explanation(explains concepts clearly and concisely)
 
5.73
Engagement(shows enthusiasm and interest in material)
 
5.77
Responsiveness(answers questions thoroughly)
 
5.91
Preparation(thoroughly prepared to teach)
 
5.91
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 78%
satisfied 22%
not satisfied 0%
Cindy

Cindy

Instructor since 2017
12 prep sessions
849 students helped
Experience
2019-Psychology prep instructor
2017-Physiology prep instructor
2017-MCAT Psychology prep instructor
2017MCAT private tutor
2016Calculus private tutor
Education
2020MSc
2014BSc (Medical Sciences)
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
Expertise(understanding of course material)
 
5.51
Organization(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.74
Explanation(explains concepts clearly and concisely)
 
5.46
Engagement(shows enthusiasm and interest in material)
 
5.66
Responsiveness(answers questions thoroughly)
 
5.74
Preparation(thoroughly prepared to teach)
 
5.48
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 62.5%
satisfied 36.4%
not satisfied 1.1%
Chun Ming Liang

Chun Ming

Instructor since 2017
14 prep sessions
363 students helped
Experience
2018 -Software developer (SGCIB, NVIDIA, ii, Amazon)
2017-Computer science prep instructor
2017-18Grader/TA
2013–16Piano teacher
Education
2020BSE (Software Engineering, Dean's Honour List)
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
Expertise(understanding of course material)
 
5.21
Organization(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.06
Explanation(explains concepts clearly and concisely)
 
4.95
Engagement(shows enthusiasm and interest in material)
 
5.69
Responsiveness(answers questions thoroughly)
 
5.46
Preparation(thoroughly prepared to teach)
 
5.23
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 50.6%
satisfied 47.1%
not satisfied 2.3%
2 SESSION(S) ADDED
Total:$0
REGISTER NOW

Saghar

Biol 241, Biol 311, Chem 351
Instructor since 2010
10 prep sessions
427 students helped
Experience
2013–presentPrep Instructor, Mechanics 
2013–presentPrep Instructor, Statics
2012–presentTutor, Statics, Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials
2012–13TA, Engineering Mechanics II
2012–13TA, Mechanics of Solids 
2011-13TA Mechanics of Materials 
2011TA, Engineering Economics
2010TA, Engineering Design & Communication 
Education
2012–presentPh.D. [Mechanical Engineering]
2012M.Sc. [Mechanical Engineering]
2009B.Sc. [Mechanical Engineering]
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
PREPARATION(understanding of course material)
 
3.79
Presentation(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.71
PREPARATION(understanding of course material)
 
5.58
PREPARATION(understanding of course material)
 
1.75
PREPARATION(understanding of course material)
 
5.83
PREPARATION(understanding of course material)
 
5.75
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 31%
satisfied 68%
not satisfied 1%